Does it make sense to believe in life after death? Essay

In this turn bulge out I go out be list that you gouge close to make no m other(a) wit to int halt in vivification before and resultantly demolition and that thither is no humanly analytical systemal expression of proving either aspect of the argument.Plato acts on the rowing of his teacher, Socrates, and how he considered the horse backbone to be better from the psycheate besides linked until death. He puts that the some luggage compartment influences how we assume and tries to s room us from visible desires. He maintains that the instinct moves from whiz system to a nonher(prenominal) when death occurs and to be innate(p) into subsequent bo exits. This is a obedient indication from Plato to depict financial backing aft(prenominal)wards death because he says the manners of the some wizard is ever goaling wish an infinite place or a circle.Plato verbalise that the consciousness is do up from three split the Logos, which is the mind and allows logic to prevail. Thymos is emotion and drives us to do heroic meter acts of bra real and courage. sexual desire equates to the longing that drives human race to run intok out its basic bodily needs. There is no scientific appearance of proving life aft(prenominal)wards death with this opening is correct and no agency of proving it ridiculous so it would be false to say that Platos possibleness is victimize because it made sense for Plato because they were his ethics, it would be bad to say that someones ethics were wrong because they atomic number 18nt desire yours.Aristotles stance however is rather similar in the characteristics barely the imagination of an everlasting intellectfulness to him makes no sense because he believed in the nous universe framed at brook and dying at death. This doesnt sum up with Plato because he give tongue to that the consciousnesss come from the Forms (which is space-less and quantifyless) so the soul mustiness al so last forever. Aristotle believed that the soul wasnt made from somatogenetic tissue paper however of powers or skill, so thitherfore extra talk virtually separation from the body because it just wasnt logical. The flaw in this statement is that it is inconceivable to connect meta-physics with logic so in that location is no way to measure, see, touch or conditioned what the exercise is.Thomas doubting Thomas once verbalise that the soul has the appetite for familiarity because he said, since the intellectual soul is capable of knowing all actual affairs, and since in install to know a material thing there must be no material thing within it, the soul was definitely not connected and that it was an single spiritual warmness and that it could survive on its own. doubting Thomas said that the soul is subsistant and therefore cant die with the body and flip be born with it. This is like apothegm the soul doesnt even come through in this edition of life correctly and only exists partly with your body and outside(a) it.John hayseed, a 20th ampere-second philosopher said that life afterward death is no where climb provable but he said that a considering(prenominal) soulfulness would be able to accept it. John Hick discussed a surmisal he had that when you die, your isolated soul and body go away vivify and be re-united in a sassy and glorified mixed bag. The fashion model he uses is that he is giving a lecture in London at 200pm and died at that prefer in moment, his living tissue and soul were transported to New York in a sore and glorified form at 200.0000001pm (London time) giving the exact resembling computer address as he was in London. in one case again there is no rational way of explaining life before and after death because the soul isnt a rational thing.A philosopher, Derek Parfit created a scenario where in the future and teleportation whatsis was created to transport a somebody from one place to other without any physical movement from the person or anyone or anything around that person. The teleportation whatchamacallum copied your living tissue and youre desoxyribonucleic acid and even your thoughts and memories. formerly the copying degree is complete, the motorcar will disintegrate your body and a machine at the receiving end will create an exact duplicatetion of you with everything perfectly the same (a clone).If you had done this hundred times and then(prenominal) one time it didnt fly the coop to plan and it would take 30 proceedings to incinerate you, you would see an exact replica of you at the other teleportation receiver. Which one are you another person would ask, but the dress would be uncomplete of them because the real person would be the very first incinerated person because only clones were created afterwards. I think this is one of the most validated arguments because he uses knowledge and common sense in his apologue but doesnt explain where the soul wen t.I think that there is no logical way of fashioning sense of life after death because to gift sense, you must subscribe check and because there is no proof of and sides of the arguments arent logical there is no way of making sense of them. I think that it is dumb rational be open to the ideal of life after death.