Rewarding and Punishment the Same Behavior Essay

What role of accompaniment entry does random drug test represent? Is this type of schedule typically effective or otiose? Answer The slip study Professional sports Rewarding and revengement the homogeneous behavior was about how in a baseball halt steroids ar being handlingd and the offense which has been caused by it.The type of reinforcement schedule discuss in this case was the random drug testing which presents the accompaniment that most of the times baseball players atomic number 18 non aw be of the superlative that they be taking drugs. This is because they dont take it intentially al single disposed by their coaches to improve implementation of the player in mealy. According to the case I agree with the decision of commissioner of the baseball. According to his decision, he gave a mo chance to the players who did not hunch forward that their coaches were giving them drugs. Whereas, he declared a ten day suspension for the first time offenders from vie t he game. precisely congress and the general public was not satisfied so the commissioner structured tougher rules to play in the game such as the three strikes, and you are out policy wherein the first time offenders were hang up from playing the game for 50 days, the second time offenders were suspended from playing the game for century days and the last one was a dispose wherein the player kittynot raise play the game. Due to the usage of steroids the rules in the other games even became tougher. The NFL and the NBA overly had to check their players if they were using drugs while playing the game.The coaches in the baseball game consumes to be strict while choosing their best players to play the game. The coaches need to be strict with rules of the game and as well as the players to break up using the usage of steroids in the baseball game. A exquisitely or a suspension is considered as a minor divulge whereas the last-ditch decision to ban the player is the correct dec ision which is made by the commissioner of baseball. . Whereas to find whether its effective or not we puke see that the type of reinforcement schedules that random drug testing represent is the variable legal separation type.As defined, this type of schedule occurs when a response is repayed after an unforeseeable amount of time has passed. In the case, the reinforcement schedule is done at random and unexpected. It is typically effective because athletes not aware of the test and when these tests leave alone be taken place. Therefore, athletes are unprepared. Unlike a fixed variable reinforcement schedule, athletes crap a fixed time of when the tests will be schedule so they can prepare and make sure their systems are undress before they take the test. . 2.What are some examples of behaviors in typical placements that supervisors reward but may actually be detrimental to others or to the make-up as a whole? As a manager, what might you do to try to avoid this quandary? . Answer The main example of a behavior in a typical organization that supervisors reward but may actually be detrimental to others or to the organization as a whole is athletes taking steroids. When athletes take steroids to enhance their performance abilities, they are misleading their managers and their fans.Initially, it may be rewarding because everyone involved gains from the profitability, sports merchandise, increased popularity and success. moreover in the end, when it is discovered that the athlete achieved recognition with the aid of steroids he destroys his account and also his team ups and countrys reputation and the subjection the fans had for him. If I was a manager, what I might do in order of battle to avoid this quandary, if I was made aware of soulfulness using steroids, I would do a random drug testing as presently as possible instead of having the whole team suffer for that one insubordinate athlete. . If you were the commissioner of baseball, what steps would you take to try to dilute the use of steroids in baseball? Is punishment likely to be the most effective interference? Why or why not? Answer If I was the commissioner of baseball, in that location are several steps that I would take to try to reduce the use of steroids in baseball. First of all, I would reinforce to all the athletes that if someone is caught using steroids they will be thrown off the team. Second, I would extend to do random drug testing. Punishment is not likely to be the most effective deterrent.This will only cause athletes to stop playing and taking steroids for a certain period of time. In addition to it I would also have taken some steps as taken by the commissioner in this case. For the 1st time offender who didnt know that they were being drugged by their coaches should be suspended for few games. In addition to that the coach must be strictly punished a huge sum of fine plus life time ban from the game. Whereas, for those who have offended it for the first time knowingly, must be suspended for a year plus a heavy amount fine should be imposed on them.And for those who have repeated it should be illegalise from baseball sport. The second part of the question was Is punishment likely to be the most effective deterrent? For me yes, punishment is the most effective deterrent. It is the challenger that everyone loves. The feeling of winning makes umteen people do anything to achieve it. scour if this means one must cheat to win. Many players used and shut away use steroids to enhance their muscles so they are stronger during game play. There can be cardinal ways of stopping the player not to use steroids, either by rewarding or by punishing.Rewarding in the sense, we can give incentives to players for not using them but the incentives of winning will be more attractive than these. Therefore one can punish the player if they use those incentives. A player cheats to win money, fans and fame. But if they are found to be using steroids, they will drift off their fame and fans and should also be heavily fined. 4. Is it okay to allow potentially wrong behaviors, which on the show may benefit organizations, to persist? Why or why not? AnswerNo, unethical behaviors must not persist even if on the surface they may benefit organizations. For short term it may be beneficial but not in long run. Any unethical behaviors can directly affect the reputation of the organization. And in todays world a good reputed organization is the most important part of organization imageing. People like to buy the service or harvest-tide from a good reputed organization. It creates goodwill of the organization. For example, in context of the given case, organization can be the baseball team and unethical behavior can be the use of steroids by the players.This may help the team to build a strong impression and can help them to win many games as well. But the day general public will scam that the victory is not due to the hard work but or else than steroids, all of their impression will be on stake. They may lose their sponsors, fans and reputation. Same was the case happened with Pakistani play team. Few of the players of Pakistani cricket team player, Salman Butt, M. Amir and Asif, were involved in match fixing. They might have earned a lot from that but when it was exposed they were punished.They had to pay look-alike amount of fine of what they earned. In addition to it now none of the companies will like to endorse just players who are involved in unethical activities. In addition to it they lost all their fans. Almost every Pakistani doesnt like them because they created a bad impression of Pakistan in the global world. As well as destroyed the image of the Pakistani team nationally and internationally. Can you imagine artifice and excellence in the corresponding sentence? What does known cheating and the Hall of Fame have in commons?What does shameful and The Hall of Fame have in common? Do es known cheating and excellence equal The Hall Of Fame? This debate doesnt have two sides. There are no hairs to split. There are no return arguments to argue. Cheating is not how to get ahead. Cheating isnt even how to compete. charge if youre never found out, Its a setup for trial elsewhere in life. Anyone that has admitted or has been proven to have used performance enhancing drugs should never even be considered for the Hall Of Fame.